Thanks to the Center for Youth Evangelism, author and Union College professor Chris Blake publicly ponders what being a disciple of Jesus means today.
Marianne Faust- Thu, 02/16/2012 - 13:30
The fact that we cannot earn our salvation has made us passive, although following is nothing passive at all. We concentrate on things we do not...no work on Sabbath, no alcohol, no cigarettes, not this and not that.
May be our faith is still too much something about knowing facts and details, nothing that changes your life. Real Christian faith is much more than just some more or different information about the world. So we get angry when this information turns out to be slightly wrong, but we get much less angry about injustice.
But how can we change, what can change us in a way that we easily and routinely act as Jesus would have acted. What can turn us in the kind of person who easily and routinely makes the Christ-like decision?
Tom Zwemer- Thu, 02/16/2012 - 15:09
Marianne
I think you agree that the Adventist health message is meat in due season. Yesterday, I sat in the car while my wife shopped for new bedding. In 20 minutes I counted 15 morbid obese people and three anorexics. The problem is Adventists too often count that message as the Gospel. The centrality is self oriented. Not Cross Centered. Once we live, move, and have our being in the risen Savior--we can be of use to the rest of the world. Otherwise want is long life but self indulgence/?
Tom Z
Elaine Nelson- Thu, 02/16/2012 - 17:49
With the increased publicity on obesity and its costs, both in health and in $$, this would be a perfect time for Adventists to offer classes in healthful eating with more receptivity. If the "health message is to be the right arm" this seems the most appropriate time.
Elaine
Marianne Faust- Fri, 02/17/2012 - 00:08
Yes, I agree that the health message is confused with the Gospel. But I think the problem is also the way to approach "being active". We tend to think there are only two ways: to be active in order to earn salvation or to be passive. Either you eat what you like or you try to earn salvation by not eating meat, milk etc...
Both ways are wrong. Both have no relation to Jesus. There must be a third way. That dicipleship way where you don't try to work on behaviour change, but you work on your relation to Jesus. The behaviour change will follow, but it will be the work of the Spirit. The closer your relationship to Jesus the more likely you will take over his feelings towards injustice for ex. Living IN Jesus might mean something like that.
He might also remind you everytime you are tempted by the Swiss Chocolate, that your health is quite important for yourself, without making a Gospel out of that...
We tend to concentrate on certain behaviours and try hard to change these, but if the motivation is only fear, the change will ony be superficial and for a limited time. We have to become a different Christ-like person. This is a change, we cannot perform, but the Spirit can. So this third way must have something to do with the relation to Jesus and the Spirit.
Pagophilus- Fri, 02/17/2012 - 02:12
What does activist mean? All Christians are to obey their masters and their governments, whether good or bad. I'm not even sure that a Christian should protest or demand anything from the government.
Marianne Faust- Fri, 02/17/2012 - 02:17
Pagophilus, all Christians are to obey their masters and their governments, wether good or bad????? I hope you don't mean that.....!!!
Nathan Blake- Fri, 02/17/2012 - 08:10
LOL, Pagophilus
LoveWave- Fri, 02/17/2012 - 08:47
What is the relevance of the Christian message if we cannot demand or protest(protestant) ?
Pagophilus- Fri, 02/17/2012 - 13:00
Marianne Faust wrote: I hope you don't mean that.....!!!
I mean exactly that. Have you read 1 Peter lately? passages like these in chapter 2: 13
Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every human institution, whether to a king as the one in authority, 14 or to governors as sent by him for the punishment of evildoers and the praise of those who do right. 15 For such is the will of God that by doing right you may silence the ignorance of foolish men.
or
18 Servants, be submissive to your masters with all respect, not only to those who are good and gentle, but also to those who are unreasonable. 19 For this finds favor, if for the sake of conscience toward God a person bears up under sorrows when suffering unjustly. 20 For what credit is there if, when you sin and are harshly treated, you endure it with patience? But if when you do what is right and suffer for it you patiently endure it, this finds favor with God.
Nathan Blake- Fri, 02/17/2012 - 15:19
ROTFL
YoungOne- Fri, 02/17/2012 - 16:56
Honestly, What If... we just sincerely cared about the person as a person and didn't always have allterior motive behind it. Christianity's evangelism has become P.R. & Marketing for the church. Christ cared for the individual as a humanbeing then as a result of his divinity meeting humanity people of their own free will surrendered to God.
Horatio- Fri, 02/17/2012 - 17:09
"All Christians are to obey their masters and their governments, whether good or bad. I'm not even sure that a Christian should protest or demand anything from the government."
Good points, Pagophilus. I don't see Jesus or His disciples protesting the abuses by the Roman government, or even the Jewish Sanhedrin. Theirs was not a social gospel; it was a transforming gospel. Paul also says that we are better off suffering loss than taking our fellow Christians to court.
We've become a nation of whiners and complainers, especially in the US.
Nathan Blake- Fri, 02/17/2012 - 17:41
Yes, one of the church's proudest moments was following your advice in Germany during the 1930s/40s.
Horatio- Fri, 02/17/2012 - 17:49
I didn't say to roll over and play dead. The apostles obeyed God first; that's why all but one of them were martyrs. But they weren't out in the streets protesting; they were busy spreading the gospel. That's what got them into trouble. It would get us into trouble, too, if we did it right.
TruthWave- Sat, 02/18/2012 - 09:09
@Elaine: Quote: "With the increased publicity on obesity and its costs, both in health and in $$, this would be a perfect time for Adventists to offer classes in healthful eating with more receptivity. If the "health message is to be the right arm" this seems the most appropriate time"
I agree with what you have stated above. I'm puzzled though, in that I have read scores of posts by you and other Spectrumites who have demeaned the SDA health message as being legalism and all based on what EGW dreamed about?! The strange irony is that we are at a time when the SDA health message needs to be shared by our churches more than ever before because of the HUGE health problems that are afflicting millions of Americans. Have you changed your position and now believe that the SDA health message is indeed inspired by God?
The truth and nothing but the truth.
Marianne Faust- Sat, 02/18/2012 - 12:14
Pagophilus you said "wether good or bad!!!" Roll over and play dead is hardly the only alternative.
George Tichy- Sat, 02/18/2012 - 14:59
To eat correctly and take good care of our health does not need any "special revelation" or even plagiarism.
Just utilizing our God-given brains, following common sense, and learning from people who study those issues will give us enough knowledge to do the right thing.
For those that are totally in the dark about this issue, may be just listening to Michele Obama will do it!!! She is already pretty good at it.
S Styrra- Sun, 02/19/2012 - 02:16
My fear is that Adventists keep finding ways to be moralistic whether it is regarding jewelry, healthy lifestyles, care of the earth or social justice. For many I still see the way they are approaching it as lmoralistic, rule bound, and loaded with fear snd guilt messages. They don't have to be that way but Adventists are great at doing things that way.
Pagophilus- Sun, 02/19/2012 - 04:25
I'm not suggesting rolling over and playing dead, and neither is Horatio, as he indicated. Actually doing something is far better than calling for change. Go and feed the poor and help the orphan. By all means petition your government to do what is right, but today's activists are largely a passive bunch. There are a lot of words and a lot of shouting and not much doing. (And not much spreading of the gospel either.)
Diakrino- Wed, 02/22/2012 - 16:02
The video’s:
… reference to the female derriere…tasteless
… diminution of core “beliefs” into humanistic musings … worthless
… tangential thought process… what we’d expect from CB
Antonio- Thu, 03/01/2012 - 11:42
Ah, si?.
Ahora un cristiano, verdadero o falso, es un activista. Pensaba que un cristiano era un misionero. Y que lo del activismo, se lo dejábamos a los partidos políticos, movimientos sociales con consignas reaccionarias, fascistas y de pensamiento único. Tan bajo hemos caido que ya no destinguimos entre el camino trazado por Jesús, que hemos elegido la autopista encabezada por gente intoxicada por ideas, intereses y pensamiento rebosante de filosofía marxista. Un cristiano no es, no debería ser nunca, un activista, sino un misionero. Preocuparse y ocuparse por los ancianos, enfermos, niños desvalidos y las mujeres ultrajadas por el simple hecho de ser mujer. Un cristiano, verdadero o falso, (por sus frutos los conoceréis) tiene una misión. No una actividad. La misión de compartir y predicar, voluntariamente, el gozo, el ejemplo, la palabra y la solidaridad con los demás por haber conocido el Evangelio Eterno de Cristo. Lo demás, lo digo humildemente y con tristeza, es marear la perdíz, perder el tiempo averiguando el sexo de los ángeles. Tal vez un dia oigamos: Apartaos de mi, nunca os conocí. Porque si dejamos de ser MISIONEROS, para convertirnos en activistas, dejaremos de ser una cosa y la contraria. Es decir, nada...
Chris. Blake- Mon, 03/12/2012 - 15:04
I hadn't looked at this in a few weeks. Some thoughts, on reflection:
1.The video was produced more than a year ago to help aim The One Project to be as spiritually pragmatic and discipleship-oriented as plausible. The film's original target audience was extremely narrow--that first year 172 people participated.
2. I am constantly amazed at the bird-walking these threads take--from health reform to obeying tyrants in the space of five comments!
3. Diakrino, it's true that my humor is pathetic at times, as my friends and students could testify. Your appraisal of a "diminution of core 'beliefs'" is a red herring here; I was attempting to frame a simple, memorable, and viable approach to Adventist discipleship, something the 28 do not even attempt to do. I definitely do not view discipleship to Jesus as "tangential." Finally, know this: I will never allow anyone to steal my joy in Christ, particularly craven posters who thoughtlessly hurl insults and then hide behind the skirts of anonymity.
The fact that we cannot earn our salvation has made us passive, although following is nothing passive at all. We concentrate on things we do not...no work on Sabbath, no alcohol, no cigarettes, not this and not that.
May be our faith is still too much something about knowing facts and details, nothing that changes your life. Real Christian faith is much more than just some more or different information about the world. So we get angry when this information turns out to be slightly wrong, but we get much less angry about injustice.
But how can we change, what can change us in a way that we easily and routinely act as Jesus would have acted. What can turn us in the kind of person who easily and routinely makes the Christ-like decision?
Marianne
I think you agree that the Adventist health message is meat in due season. Yesterday, I sat in the car while my wife shopped for new bedding. In 20 minutes I counted 15 morbid obese people and three anorexics. The problem is Adventists too often count that message as the Gospel. The centrality is self oriented. Not Cross Centered. Once we live, move, and have our being in the risen Savior--we can be of use to the rest of the world. Otherwise want is long life but self indulgence/?
Tom Z
With the increased publicity on obesity and its costs, both in health and in $$, this would be a perfect time for Adventists to offer classes in healthful eating with more receptivity. If the "health message is to be the right arm" this seems the most appropriate time.
Elaine
Yes, I agree that the health message is confused with the Gospel. But I think the problem is also the way to approach "being active". We tend to think there are only two ways: to be active in order to earn salvation or to be passive. Either you eat what you like or you try to earn salvation by not eating meat, milk etc...
Both ways are wrong. Both have no relation to Jesus. There must be a third way. That dicipleship way where you don't try to work on behaviour change, but you work on your relation to Jesus. The behaviour change will follow, but it will be the work of the Spirit. The closer your relationship to Jesus the more likely you will take over his feelings towards injustice for ex. Living IN Jesus might mean something like that.
He might also remind you everytime you are tempted by the Swiss Chocolate, that your health is quite important for yourself, without making a Gospel out of that...
We tend to concentrate on certain behaviours and try hard to change these, but if the motivation is only fear, the change will ony be superficial and for a limited time. We have to become a different Christ-like person. This is a change, we cannot perform, but the Spirit can. So this third way must have something to do with the relation to Jesus and the Spirit.
What does activist mean? All Christians are to obey their masters and their governments, whether good or bad. I'm not even sure that a Christian should protest or demand anything from the government.
Pagophilus, all Christians are to obey their masters and their governments, wether good or bad????? I hope you don't mean that.....!!!
LOL, Pagophilus
What is the relevance of the Christian message if we cannot demand or protest(protestant) ?
Marianne Faust wrote: I hope you don't mean that.....!!!
I mean exactly that. Have you read 1 Peter lately? passages like these in chapter 2: 13
Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every human institution, whether to a king as the one in authority, 14 or to governors as sent by him for the punishment of evildoers and the praise of those who do right. 15 For such is the will of God that by doing right you may silence the ignorance of foolish men.
or
18 Servants, be submissive to your masters with all respect, not only to those who are good and gentle, but also to those who are unreasonable. 19 For this finds favor, if for the sake of conscience toward God a person bears up under sorrows when suffering unjustly. 20 For what credit is there if, when you sin and are harshly treated, you endure it with patience? But if when you do what is right and suffer for it you patiently endure it, this finds favor with God.
ROTFL
Honestly, What If... we just sincerely cared about the person as a person and didn't always have allterior motive behind it. Christianity's evangelism has become P.R. & Marketing for the church. Christ cared for the individual as a humanbeing then as a result of his divinity meeting humanity people of their own free will surrendered to God.
"All Christians are to obey their masters and their governments, whether good or bad. I'm not even sure that a Christian should protest or demand anything from the government."
Good points, Pagophilus. I don't see Jesus or His disciples protesting the abuses by the Roman government, or even the Jewish Sanhedrin. Theirs was not a social gospel; it was a transforming gospel. Paul also says that we are better off suffering loss than taking our fellow Christians to court.
We've become a nation of whiners and complainers, especially in the US.
Yes, one of the church's proudest moments was following your advice in Germany during the 1930s/40s.
I didn't say to roll over and play dead. The apostles obeyed God first; that's why all but one of them were martyrs. But they weren't out in the streets protesting; they were busy spreading the gospel. That's what got them into trouble. It would get us into trouble, too, if we did it right.
@Elaine: Quote: "With the increased publicity on obesity and its costs, both in health and in $$, this would be a perfect time for Adventists to offer classes in healthful eating with more receptivity. If the "health message is to be the right arm" this seems the most appropriate time"
I agree with what you have stated above. I'm puzzled though, in that I have read scores of posts by you and other Spectrumites who have demeaned the SDA health message as being legalism and all based on what EGW dreamed about?! The strange irony is that we are at a time when the SDA health message needs to be shared by our churches more than ever before because of the HUGE health problems that are afflicting millions of Americans. Have you changed your position and now believe that the SDA health message is indeed inspired by God?
The truth and nothing but the truth.
Pagophilus you said "wether good or bad!!!" Roll over and play dead is hardly the only alternative.
To eat correctly and take good care of our health does not need any "special revelation" or even plagiarism.
Just utilizing our God-given brains, following common sense, and learning from people who study those issues will give us enough knowledge to do the right thing.
For those that are totally in the dark about this issue, may be just listening to Michele Obama will do it!!! She is already pretty good at it.
My fear is that Adventists keep finding ways to be moralistic whether it is regarding jewelry, healthy lifestyles, care of the earth or social justice. For many I still see the way they are approaching it as lmoralistic, rule bound, and loaded with fear snd guilt messages. They don't have to be that way but Adventists are great at doing things that way.
I'm not suggesting rolling over and playing dead, and neither is Horatio, as he indicated. Actually doing something is far better than calling for change. Go and feed the poor and help the orphan. By all means petition your government to do what is right, but today's activists are largely a passive bunch. There are a lot of words and a lot of shouting and not much doing. (And not much spreading of the gospel either.)
The video’s:
… reference to the female derriere…tasteless
… diminution of core “beliefs” into humanistic musings … worthless
… tangential thought process… what we’d expect from CB
Ah, si?.
Ahora un cristiano, verdadero o falso, es un activista. Pensaba que un cristiano era un misionero. Y que lo del activismo, se lo dejábamos a los partidos políticos, movimientos sociales con consignas reaccionarias, fascistas y de pensamiento único. Tan bajo hemos caido que ya no destinguimos entre el camino trazado por Jesús, que hemos elegido la autopista encabezada por gente intoxicada por ideas, intereses y pensamiento rebosante de filosofía marxista. Un cristiano no es, no debería ser nunca, un activista, sino un misionero. Preocuparse y ocuparse por los ancianos, enfermos, niños desvalidos y las mujeres ultrajadas por el simple hecho de ser mujer. Un cristiano, verdadero o falso, (por sus frutos los conoceréis) tiene una misión. No una actividad. La misión de compartir y predicar, voluntariamente, el gozo, el ejemplo, la palabra y la solidaridad con los demás por haber conocido el Evangelio Eterno de Cristo. Lo demás, lo digo humildemente y con tristeza, es marear la perdíz, perder el tiempo averiguando el sexo de los ángeles. Tal vez un dia oigamos: Apartaos de mi, nunca os conocí. Porque si dejamos de ser MISIONEROS, para convertirnos en activistas, dejaremos de ser una cosa y la contraria. Es decir, nada...
I hadn't looked at this in a few weeks. Some thoughts, on reflection:
1.The video was produced more than a year ago to help aim The One Project to be as spiritually pragmatic and discipleship-oriented as plausible. The film's original target audience was extremely narrow--that first year 172 people participated.
2. I am constantly amazed at the bird-walking these threads take--from health reform to obeying tyrants in the space of five comments!
3. Diakrino, it's true that my humor is pathetic at times, as my friends and students could testify. Your appraisal of a "diminution of core 'beliefs'" is a red herring here; I was attempting to frame a simple, memorable, and viable approach to Adventist discipleship, something the 28 do not even attempt to do. I definitely do not view discipleship to Jesus as "tangential." Finally, know this: I will never allow anyone to steal my joy in Christ, particularly craven posters who thoughtlessly hurl insults and then hide behind the skirts of anonymity.
4. Antonio: Si, mas o menos. :)