Annual Council Diary, Sunday, October 9, 2011

What is the goal of the Great Commission? Is it just to baptize or to also make disciples? What is the future of the church in the Middle East?  

Those were the significant questions of realignment that marked Sunday’s session of the Executive Committee of the Seventh-day Adventist Church.

General Conference Secretary G. T. Ng (pictured) asked the questions about the Great Commission in the liveliest statistical report in many a year. Leavened with his trademark humor and as heavy on philosophy as on actual numbers, Ng said the imperative (goal) of the Great Commission is to make disciples, that baptism is simply a means to that goal, and teaching is to continue even after baptism.  

Decrying the numbers game, Ng said the Adventist church added 25 million members in the last 50 years, but then lost 8 million of those members creating a tremendous missiological black hole. In myth-buster fashion, he examined the contributing factors to that black hole.

“We have become over-dependent on public evangelism,” he said noting the problem of post-evangelism care and short-term mission trips. What happens when everybody goes home? Those newly baptized people become nobody’s child.

Adventist soteriology would seem to suggest that in the churches we believe in justification by grace, in the classroom it is justification by works, and in administration it is justification by numbers, he said, evoking a wave of laughter. What we don’t mention about the numbers game is that numbers accord status. We like to talk about glowing numbers because they mean success. “Why bother with nurture? There will be no stars in my crown for that,” he said.

With apologies to the accountants in the audience, Ng suggested that those who live by numbers sooner or later will be compromised by them, citing The Seven Signs of Ethical Collapse: How to Spot Moral Meltdowns in Companies by Marianne Jennings.

In conclusion, he returned to the goal of the Great Commission as being to make disciples. He said that in reality the church’s numbers game is not about numbers, it is about people. And baptism is not an end product, rather it is a means in the making of disciples.

Next he introduced the rest of the secretariat team, including Archivist David Trim who also gave a very different report from past years in that there were no charts of numbers. Trim talked about the problems in the membership statistics rather than the actual numbers. He said that without the mortality rates being factored into the statistics, we get an unrealistic idea about the total number of members. He said the statistics cry out (like the rocks) that our membership numbers have been overstated. Membership audits have taken place in some divisions, he noted, such as South America. And where it has been done it has cleared the way for significant gains. He recommended that divisions and unions encourage audits and that the GC provide training for doing the audits.

In addition to church membership, Trim talked about the need to get better figures about church attendance. He said he would be asking that churches count people in attendance on the 2nd and 7th Sabbaths of each quarter.

Encouraging better record keeping at the churches could be the first step in seeking those who have been lost sheep, Trim said, echoing Ng’s desire to address the black hole of membership. It also is significant for the research element that has been added to the newly named Office of Archives, Statistics and Research.

David Trim, director of the office of Archives, Statistics and Research—photo: Ansel Oliver/ANN.

The Middle East realignment was the last item on the agenda for the day. An extensive rearrangement of the work in the Middle East was proposed by the Greater Middle East and Mediterranean Survey Commission created by the General Conference. In the proposal:

  1. South Sudan would become part of East-Central Africa Division.
  2. Pakistan Union would become part of Southern-Asian Pacific Division.
  3. Afghanistan would become part of the Southern Union of Euro-Asia Division.
  4. Israel Field would be attached directly to the General Conference
  5. South Cyprus would be left with the Trans-European Division.
  6.  The new union would be called the Greater Middle East Union (GMEU) Mission and would include the countries of Algeria, Bahrain, North Cyprus, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Morocco, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Western Sahara, and Yeman. It would have a population of 500 million (larger than all but three of the divisions).
  7. The Greater Middle East Union Mission would start with approximately 2,000 members in 70 churches and organized companies, and 300 fulltime workers. The headquarters location for the GMEU would be located in Beirut, Lebanon, where the current Middle East Union Mission has its newly created offices. It is next to the campus of the Middle East University which is key to training leaders for the union.
  8. The General Conference Greater Middle East Union Oversight Committee will be chaired by Michael L. Ryan with Harald Wollan as secretary and George O. Egwakhe, treasurer and 13 other individuals.

By the time the extensive presentation about the proposed changes to the Middle East Union had been made there was very little time left for discussion. The current president of the Middle East Union, Kjell Aune, was only the second person at the microphone and it was 5 minutes before the 5:30 scheduled end for the meeting. He asked if the item were going to be continued to the next day. President Ted Wilson was chairing the session and he instructed Aune to go ahead with his comment because, “We will finish tonight.”

Aune responded that process was one of his first points. He said that while the GC Commission had met with many people, the Middle East Union Executive Committee had not been consulted on the proposed change.

This became a matter of concern to others in the audience, too. In consulting the Working Policy it was not clear exactly where this kind of change fit into the rules, since it was not the same as simply changing the boundaries of one conference. The official word was that the process the Commission followed met the intention of the rules.  

Bertil Wiklander (Trans-European Division), Bruno Vertallier (Euro-Africa Division)—photo by Ansel Oliver/ANN.

Bertil Wiklander, president of the Trans European Division (TED) which stood to lose a significant amount of territory in the move, was gracious in his expression of love for the people of the territory and wanting the best for them. He did ask to keep Israel as part of the TED territory, and asked that it be voted on separately. The motion to vote separately on Israel was defeated.

The vote for change went ahead and was approved at 6:07 pm, 37 minutes after the scheduled close of the meeting.

[Top Photo: GC Secretary G. T. Ng shows chart of the world church's membership—photo by Ansel Oliver/ANN.]

Elaine Nelson - Mon, 10/10/2011 - 19:27

Ng is a refreshing change from the usual self-congratulatory accounts. Now, we may realize next time, a much better count of present memberships.

Elaine

Carl- Cassem - Mon, 10/10/2011 - 19:39

I wonder how this new arrangement is going to work. The Europeans are relieved to get the Middle Easterners off their backs and vice versa.

Time will tell if this is good or not. Homer Trecartin has been appointed as president of GMEU. From what I have heard, he does not have much compassion and understanding of the culture, which might be challenging. Michael Ryan, does not seem to be afraid of dictating either, I am not sure if that is going to work in a culture where people are trying to break free from dictators.

Also in Trinidad and Tobago - Mon, 10/10/2011 - 19:57

This post humanizes church leaders.
At least they are thinking about the same things some of us are (numbers game etc.)

billman - Mon, 10/10/2011 - 23:52

Ng does sound like a breath of fresh air. He needs a promotion, but only if replaces himself with another equally capable.

While I can support the concept of the restructuring in Middle East, I have some of concern over the process followed. Is this change one that can be actioned by Annual Council? Wouldn't the world body through the General Conference session need to approve this? How can the Annual Council members make an informed decision in the space of 37 minutes? How wide was the consultation - MEU doesn't seem to have featured? Were briefing papers made available to attendees prior to the meeting, or was the only knowledge of it included in the agenda?

Sounds like someone playing God...

bevin - Tue, 10/11/2011 - 04:05

It sounds like someone presenting a done deal

Not necessarily a bad thing - rooms full of people, like this one, are the wrong place to make such decisions

/Bevin

Carl- Cassem - Tue, 10/11/2011 - 06:01

I am not sure if any of you guys noticed that they made a huge change to a whole union and realigned territories of Divisions. Aren't those changes supposed to happen during a Genereal Conferene session and voted by the world wide church?

It seems once again the heavy hand of Teddy was in this. Did you notice what Aune (MEU president), that the MEU executive committee was not consulted. Furthermore, it seems like Homer Trecartin was appointed as the GMEU president. What is happening to Aune? What is happening to the missionaries working in those areas? There is something not right going on here.

David Trim - Tue, 10/11/2011 - 07:05

The changes to the Middle East were the result of almost a year's work by a survey commission, established by last year's Annual Council, as provided for in Working Policy. It requires the vote of a GC Session to endorse the creation of a new Division but not to realign territories within Divisions - that has happened between Sessions before, so there is ample precedent, though this certainly is one of the largest and most significant territorial reorganisations the church has carried out.
The MEU Committee may not have formally debated this issue, but the Survey Commission consulted very widely. It had input from all levels of church organisations within the affected regions, including from church-members not in denominational employment. It also was based on a substantial study of the 13 decades of history of the church in the Middle East, an historical and statistical study that I was privileged to research and write.
In all, I believe this is both a good decision, and one based on an extensive and rigorous process.

Carl- Cassem - Tue, 10/11/2011 - 12:12

David Trim,

You say "The MEU Committee may not have formally debated this issue, but the Survey Commission consulted very widely."

Who was on this Survey Commission? Where are the documents? Who was consulted in this survey commission. I have close friends all over the Middle East within the denomination, when I asked them, they had not even heard of a Survey Commission.

How can a survey commission formally assigned by the denomination, not consult a Union President (Aune) formally elected by the church. Why didn't they talk to him if there was an issue, as the biblical mandate asks us?

You say, "It also was based on a substantial study of the 13 decades of history of the church in the Middle East, an historical and statistical study that I was privileged to research and write." I hate to say this, when was the last time you were in the Middle East? What do you really know about the church in the Middle East, namely Egypt, Jordan, Syrian, Lebanon, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar etc.

All in all, something is not right. I must admit that the Middle Easterners did not want to be under the TED and TED did not want the MEU. I understand the mutuality.

K R Mathew - Tue, 10/11/2011 - 12:46

If this is true, Kjell and his loyal crew have failed to be united in these new change proposal. Rightly why should he be united, vested interest probably is shattered. I Know Homer Tracartin and He will fit for the position he will hold. Lets pray for him and his team.

K R Mathew - Tue, 10/11/2011 - 12:50

The dictatorship is atlast eleminated. A proper manageent will help the new union to progress well. I dont know who you know in MEU who have given u the feedback (basically thier resentment). What happens, happens for good. God bless the new team.

K R Mathew - Tue, 10/11/2011 - 12:51

I wlecome the change. Its infact too late.

K R Mathew - Tue, 10/11/2011 - 12:56

Carl, Mid easterners in UAE, Qatar and Saudi are filipinos (mjority members). In fact these terrritories should have been under Asia Pacific division ( i know geographically not possible). The funniest was that Pakistan is now under Asia pacific division when it should be under south asia division particularly related to its culture and language. God bless all who get along and divide these regions for better governance..

Carl- Cassem - Tue, 10/11/2011 - 13:04

K R Matthew,

I never said the change was bad. I just don't appreciate the ethics/politics behind all this. Kjell Aune is a fine man and a good leader. Homer is a fine man too. No Doubt.

The Middle Easterners have been wanting to get out of the TED for a long time and the main reason is resources. There is a lot more resources with the GC than the TED.

However, once again, who was consulted in the Middle East. Who was on this commission. How can people like David Trim, who have never lived or even been to the Middle East, research and make informed decisions. That is what scares me.

As I mentioned earlier on, Time will tell. As Bertil Wiklander said, "We have not had much success with evangelism among Arabic Muslims in the Middle East, but then no one else has either."

Anonymouswon - Tue, 10/11/2011 - 13:11

I would be curious if Gerald Whitehouse, the one in the church who best understands the evangelism to Muslims, reads Spectrum and would provide his thoughts. I hope it is not to dangerous for him for his ideas to be presented.

Website editor - it might be great to solicit a blog entry from him.

------

Interesting that 15% of the total membership of the new mission are employed by the church.

Does anyone have numbers that of the 2000 members, how many were converted from an Islamic background?

Carl - Tue, 10/11/2011 - 14:02

Anonymouswon,

I think most of them are immigrants. There are a only a handful of converts from Islam from the Middle East.

The Middle East runs huge organizations with no tangible result for the time being. That says something about the situation.

billman - Tue, 10/11/2011 - 15:50

What I find interesting about the Adventist Village of 100, is the comparison against the World Village

AV---Continent---------WV
37---Africa---------------14
32---Latin America-----6
19---Asia----------------60
7-----North America----8
3-----South Pacific------1
2-----Europe------------11

Time for some adventist Latin Americans to migrate to Spain, and adventist Africans to migrate to Qatar, to balance things up a little.

User login

Newsletter

Organizations

Fri, 08/31/2012 - Sun, 09/02/2012
Job Dybdahl, Sigve Tonstad, Harri Kuhalampi
Sat, 09/08/2012 | San Diego Adventist Forum
Sigve Tonstad, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Religion, Loma Linda University

Current Issue

Not yet a subscriber? Subscribe today!

Ads

Support Spectrum

Connect with Spectrum