The European Sunday Alliance

While Seventh-day Adventists have long held that enforced Sunday worship would become an issue for Seventh-day Adventists in the last days, during my lifetime the trend here in North America has been in the direction of more, not less, liberty in matters of worship. When I was growing up my home state of North Dakota had stern Sunday-closing laws, as did most states. Those have largely disappeared, lingering now only in a few states where laws restrict the Sunday sale of alcohol.

 

We might be tempted to think we’re out of the woods on this matter, if things like this didn’t pop up:

 

“A work-free Sunday and decent working hours are of paramount importance for citizens throughout Europe. We, the undersigned, believe that all citizens of the European Union are entitled to benefit from decent working hours that, as a matter of principle, exclude working late evenings, nights, bank holidays and Sundays. We believe that today, legislation and practices in place at EU and Member States levels need to be more protective of the health, safety, dignity of everyone and should more attentively promote the reconciliation of professional and family life. We believe that social cohesion in the European citizenship should be reinforced.”

 

That’s the purpose statement of a group called The European Sunday Alliance, that  on 20 June 2011 pitched the idea of Sunday no-work legislation to the European Union's Economic and Social Committee in Brussels

 

Is there more, or less, here than meets the eye? The group states its purpose in terms of social justice: “Together for decent working hours.” Europe is among the most secular regions of the world, which makes it seem improbable that this movement would ever find much support for a distinctly religious enforcement of Sunday. Yet most of the founding members are Christian groups, and specifying Sunday rather than “a day of rest” is troubling given Europe’s massive Jewish and Muslim populations. The group’s website says that “life/work-balance and social cohesion … depend on a vast majority of people [having] their lawful free time at the same time.”

 

Raafat Kamal, director for Public Affairs and Religious Liberty of the North European Headquarters of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, issued this statement:

 

“We support the notion that people need a day of rest to achieve a life/work-balance to maintain the health and safety of workers. This is modeled by God in the biblical creation week where he worked for six days and rested on the seventh. At the same time, we want to be sure that those who don't have Sunday as a designated religious day of rest will be respected and tolerated. I hope that the partners in the European Sunday Alliance network who are trying to raise awareness of the value of synchronized free Sunday for European societies will appreciate the pluralistic dimensions of the European Union countries and the importance of respecting those with different religiousbeliefs and practices. I also trust that this advocacy campaign for protection of a work-free Sunday will not result in escalation of tension among different groups.”

Jim Roberts - Thu, 08/04/2011 - 11:31

European Union's Economic and Social Committee in Brussels
I noticed that economic was before social.

Wars and crisis bring about whatever those in power can pull off....mass slaughter and oppressive legislation.
America will fall in line...as the need arises.

The lamb that speaks like a dragon

Elaine Nelson - Thu, 08/04/2011 - 11:41

The millions of unemployed here in the U.S. would be grateful to have work on any day. Economics is what drives the work force. No institution can make work, or stop work, but they have a voice to spread their purposes.

Such a law has no religious overtones, although it is being supported by religions. It has minor influence with the European population.

Elaine

David Trim - Thu, 08/04/2011 - 12:14

Anyone who imagines this law has "no religious overtones" needs to go and live on the Continent of Europe - not just go there as a tourist. The secularity of Europe is undoubted. But that is precisely why Europe's churches are adopting this approach - it is no secret (see reports in major European papers over the last 6-7 years), that they are trying to achieve an essentially religious goal - but because of the secular nature of society, they are stressing "social cohesion" (a major buzz term in Europe in the last years - it is code for dealing with racial and religious minorities) over theology - but it is still a specifically Christian religious objective. I agree, rights of workers should be protected - they should not be expected to work every day - but it is not essential, in social or economic terms, that everyone have Sunday off. That is just cover for the ecclesiastical objective.

rescued - Thu, 08/04/2011 - 12:25

I have live in Europe for many a year, David. You are right in that "social cohesion" is code for dealing with racial and religious minorities. I doubt very much your conclusion that the ultimate objective is ecclesiastical. Just the opposite, the ecclesiastical objective is merely another tool for the social objective which is to force the immigrants into assimilating rather than bringing in what many "mainstream" citizens consider to be aspects of their culture and religion that threatens European cultures and societies.

This is not a sign of the end. This is a sign of what's to come as the Islamic "threat" spreads throughout Europe, then North America and then South America over the next two generations. If EGW were alive today, she would be writing The Great Controversy, not about the RCC, but about Islam.

Joe Willey - Thu, 08/04/2011 - 12:52

I grew up in North Dakota with sanctions over Sunday observance. In the summers baseball was the most splendid activity on Sunday afternoon and somehow became a permissible substitute for Sunday obligations. Local blue laws controlled how the game was played on Sundays. Certainly, it seemed that every town and village had a team and competition between towns was as fierce as making sure harvest was completed before winter and the barn was filled with hay. Baseball in North Dakota was leisure and a gambling activity but was still played on Sundays because the need for baseball was stronger than the law that attempted to restrict Sunday commerce. The game was played in the afternoon after church. The game had to be completed by 7 PM in the evening. In fact the umpire called the game at 7 PM because of sacred mass. And in the northern part of the state, next to Canada where I lived, the umpire was the Catholic priest and no one contested his calls at home plate or when he announced the game was over at 7 PM. The social commandment at the time not to drink booze continued on Sunday afternoons behind the stands in the parking lot. Drinking was certainly less likely to be enforced after 7 PM, even by the Sheriff who played second base.

Dwight Eisenhower was baptized when he became president. He made sure that cabinet meetings opened with prayer. In general, he endorsed religion. But he never became too specific. I think he’d be the first to express his thanks that America had not turned to religious persecution just because he did the political thing of being baptized. The same could be said for Father Joseph in North Dakota who in no small way enjoyed playing cards on Sunday afternoon in the winter and umpiring baseball in the summers.

I am not a reliable theologian or predictor of human behavior or how to deal with disgruntled parishioners who want to reinforce their own religious views. It seems to me though, that the interests of humans always run in the same direction and in seeking prosperity.

Cheers

tjoe

AntonCH - Thu, 08/04/2011 - 13:10

There exist several National Sunday Alliances in Europe. In some European states we have already since ages quite strict Sunday laws and live very well with it. Nobody forces us to work on Saturday or forbids divine services on Sabbath nor are we forced to worship on Sunday. Don't panic bcause the inception of the European Sunday Alliance has taken place. Adventists always tend to bring political events in line with their prophetic interpretation and if it doesn't fit we make it fit.

The launch of the European Sunday Alliance was poorly covered by the media in Europe, - with the exception of the Adventist media and they are read by Adventists.
People in Europe are secular and withdraw in huge numbers their church memership because of church taxation and especially because of the many cases of sexual abuse in the RCC - and unfortunately not because of the loud cry of Adventists "go our of it" (Rev 18:4). Adventists are barely existing in the perception of the European public. So the masses that go out of it don't join the Adventists.

In 2010 some members of the European Parliament (MEP) have not been successful to introdce in an amendment of the EU-working-time-directive the same sentence that was already 1993 in that directive: "The minimum rest period [24 hours] in accordance with paragraph 1 generally includes Sunday.“ But in 1993 nobody - and no Adventist either - knew about this sentence and nobody paniced. It has been there in 1993 and no Sunday law has been established. Now the MEPs try again to introduce this sentence with the additional support of the European Sunday Alliance.

I have made the experience that as long as there is a common knowledge in the society about the weekly 7-day rhythm we as Adventists have much better chances to find understanding and support if we ask for Sabbath-free in the workplace or for exams at the Universities. The fight for Sunday in a secular society helps also Adventists in tis regard.

By the way: As Adventists we could learn a lot from the down to earth social, economical, ecological etc. approach and the arguments of the benefits of a work free day (It is Sabbath theology!): time for family, everybody has the right to rest, we work to live and we dont live to work... We have mainly argued which is the biblical restday but barely have we shown the public the benefits of Sabbath for our live, health, family, society, ecology.

Don't panic in the US in regards to what happens over here in Europe - don't you know that a Sunday law (if ever it will come as we have expected it) will be launched by some other players than the EU?

lorenseibold@am... - Thu, 08/04/2011 - 13:23

Interesting comment, Anton, especially the observation that these kinds of initiatives actually raise awareness and so might be helpful to SDAs! You're right that that's not what we American SDAs would conclude when we read something like this.

Still, the force of it, and the way it is worded, makes me think that Rescued is on the right track: that its appearance right now is a reaction to the growing Muslim population in Europe.

But it surprises me that they would make this recommendation without consulting the Jewish community, and it makes me wonder if there still exist vestiges, perhaps subconscious, of the anti-Semitism that gripped Europe for so many centuries.

Loren

pat travis - Thu, 08/04/2011 - 13:22

How can this possibly be happening "Liberty Mag" and others? Europe doesn't even have a "religious rt." or Tea Party! :>)

Your Friend - Thu, 08/04/2011 - 13:38

Obviously the intent has to be religious, otherwise why wasn't a different day selected or why wasn't one day in seven the theme of the pitch rather than for no Sunday work? One wonders how much influence the Roman Catholic church has on such proposals? Anyone have an insight?

Alicia Weston - Thu, 08/04/2011 - 15:26

6 day shalt thou labour and do all thy work

- interesting how we use that to demand one day off for worship and rest, but don't use it to demand everyone work all 6 days. For many of us it is 5 day for labour, one for rest and one for play. Although life is getting tougher and more and more work 6 or even 7 days.

Faithful Disciple - Thu, 08/04/2011 - 16:15

It takes baby steps to climb the wide road that leads to destruction that is described in the book of Matthew. Hardly ever is something bad very quickly thrust on the public. It is usually the old frog in the boiling water scenario. Brothers and sisters, Jesus is coming very soon. There are people who currently see what is happening in the world. The Holy Spirit is directing them to get ready. Get ready! Get ready!! I have no doubt that the Sunday laws that have been predicted are on the way.

Faithful Disciple

S Styrra - Thu, 08/04/2011 - 17:51

"Brothers and sisters, Jesus is coming very soon. There are people who currently see what is happening in the world. The Holy Spirit is directing them to get ready. Get ready! Get ready!! I have no doubt that the Sunday laws that have been predicted are on the way."

Faithful Disciples

Spoken by faithful disciples every day of every year since the Great Controversy was first published:
1858, 1859, 1860, 1861, 1862, 1863, 1864, 1865, 1866, 1867, 1868, 1869, 1870, 1871, 1872, 1873, 1874, 1875, 1876, 1877, 1878, 1879, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1883, 1884, 1885, 1886, 1887, 1888, 1889, 1890, 1891, 1892, 1893, 1894, 1895, 1896, 1897, 1898, 1899, 1900, 1901, 1902, 1903, 1904, 1905, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1909, 1910, 1911, 1912, 1913, 1914, 1915, 1916, 1917, 1918, 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, 1923, 1924, 1925, 1926, 1927, 1928, 1929, 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942, 1943, 1944, 1945, 1946, 1947, 1948, 1949, 1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1955, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 ... 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 etc etc ad infinitum

Elaine Nelson - Thu, 08/04/2011 - 18:10

No one has explained what is meant by "Get Ready." What should an individual do that he is not doing currently?

Elaine

Alicia Weston - Thu, 08/04/2011 - 18:45

To be ready:

Eschew al personal sin. Ask forgiveness then show true repentance by no doing them again, with the power of the Holy Spirit.

Devoting your time to reading the Red Books and the Bible and praying. If reading other books, to not read anything that is fictional, and definitely not read anything that is written and published by non0SDAs.

This means being vegetarian and preferably vegan, abstaining from anything relating to coffee, tea, cocoa, refined foods ...

Not watching TV except 3ABN and not going to the cinema. Sharing evangelistic DVDs not watching commercial ones.

Wearing clothes that show minimal flesh.

Finding ways every day to witness about Adventism and to confront the sinful world with it's evilness.

Except when witnessing, keep away from unbelievers and lax Adventists in order to be uncorrupted by the world and to stay pure.

To only use the KJV and a concordance when studying the Bible. Academic scholarship is liberal and leads to doubt and eternal damnation.

Use only hymns in worship and avoid any music that makes your feet want to tap or your body move. Worship only to piano and organ (and maybe orchestral instruments).

Spend time seeking out and confessing every sin in your life.

Sabbath afternoon is only for bushwalking, Bible studies or letter boxing evangelistic materials.

Accept historic adventism without any doubts and believe 100% that it is divinely appointed by God as the unquestionable truth.

Don't dance or play sport or participate in other frivolous activities.

This is just the start of what I was taught. What are some others?

Faithful Disciple - Thu, 08/04/2011 - 19:03

Alicia, you sound like a very unhappy person. I'm sorry if my post hit a bad note with you. Take care. Maranatha!

Faithful Disciple

Alicia - Thu, 08/04/2011 - 19:20

I'm a very happy and humorous person!

But the church programming I got when a child and youth would have killed me if I hadn't rejected it and turned into a very happy liberated and very liberal Adventist!!!

frank7 - Thu, 08/04/2011 - 21:29

Jesus said, "Therefore, keep watch, because you do not know on what day your Lord will come." What does that mean other than living a life that is, and using what we have been freely given as an expression of love for God and others?

Jesus said these words 2,000 years ago. His coming seemed soon to his disciples then. It has seemed soon to Adventists for the past 160+ years. I think Jesus' point is that we need to live authentically as his followers in this world, and in expectation of one day standing before him, regardless of what time it is now.

Thanks...

Frank

Michael D. Peabody - Thu, 08/04/2011 - 22:19

Liberty Magazine featured this as part of a recent round table discussion. You can read some of the responses here: http://www.libertymagazine.org/index.php?id=1760

Sirje Walkowiak - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 02:17

Jesus said, "Therefore, keep watch, because you do not know on what day your Lord will come." What does that mean other than living a life that is, and using what we have been freely given as an expression of love for God and others?

Jesus said these words 2,000 years ago. His coming seemed soon to his disciples then. It has seemed soon to Adventists for the past 160+ years. I think Jesus' point is that we need to live authentically as his followers in this world, and in expectation of one day standing before him, regardless of what time it is now. Frank

The end is as near as your last heart beat. No need to manufacture other catastrophes.

Faithful Disciple - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 02:32

“…knowing this first: that scoffers will come in the last days, walking according to their own lusts, and saying, “Where is the promise of His coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation.” But, beloved, do not forget this one thing, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance. But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in which the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements will melt with fervent heat; both the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up. Therefore, beloved, looking forward to these things, be diligent to be found by Him in peace, without spot and blameless; You therefore, beloved, since you know this beforehand, beware lest you also fall from your own steadfastness, being led away with the error of the wicked…” (2 Peter 3:3, 4, 8-10, 14, 17 NKJV)

Brothers and Sisters, Jesus IS coming soon. Please get ready! I'm sure people thought Noah was a kook too, but there were plenty of signs that destruction was coming then, just as there are today.

Faithful Disciple

Sirje Walkowiak - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 02:35

Europe is currently being over run by Muslim immigration. Various countries are starting to push back, distancing themselves from accommodating, what they see as, intrusion on their cultures. It's not surprising that Sunday vs Friday issue is coming up. Holland, I believe, has demanded the veil be lifted for identity purposes etc.

From the SDA perspective, I think we would be disappointed if Sunday laws didn't come to the US. There's nothing like standing true under perceived persecution to bolster up our identity as "the remnant" . Never mind if we lie, steal or cheat, at least we keep the right day - or do we?

(Can't resist in bringing up, again, the fact that Saturday Sabbath is NOT the biblical Sabbath as the Hebrews kept it before the Romans changed their calendar, making this discussion "much ado about nothing".)

Sirje Walkowiak - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 02:37

Europe is currently being over run by Muslim immigration. Various countries are starting to push back, distancing themselves from accommodating, what they see as, intrusion on their cultures. It's not surprising that Sunday vs Friday issue is coming up. Holland, I believe, has demanded the veil be lifted for identity purposes etc.

From the SDA perspective, I think we would be disappointed if Sunday laws didn't come to the US. There's nothing like standing true under perceived persecution to bolster up our identity as "the remnant" . Never mind if we lie, steal or cheat, at least we keep the right day - or do we?

(Can't resist in bringing up, again, the fact that Saturday Sabbath is NOT the biblical Sabbath as the Hebrews kept it before the Romans changed their calendar, making this discussion "much ado about nothing".)

Thomas. - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 03:01

In Australia the law is that Muslim women lift the veil when asked to by authorities for identity checks, and the major representatives of the Muslim community have publicly stated in the media recently that they support that and have no concern about that.

Pagophilus - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 03:42

Sirje, you obviously don't understand how the calendar works. The flow of days did not get disrupted, only the numbering of days got changed. The weekly cycle has continued unbroken since Creation in around 4004BC until now. Especially ever since Christ's time, it's there is clear evidence that the cycle is unbroken.

Thomas. - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 04:13

What evidence is there?

Aage Rendalen - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 05:01

Conservatives in this country argue that Europe is being taken over my Islam. On a recent thread about the Norwegian massacre, SDA conservative David Read and others made this point repeatedly. Given this fact, I hope they will not pop up on this thread arguing that Sunday legislation is right around the corner in Europe. You can't have it both ways.

The reality of the matter is that secular Europeans have always liked Sunday as a day off. In Norway stores are almost all closed on Sunday. This, however, has nothing whatsoever to do with religion, although it's an echo of an ancient creed, and the thought that any European, short of lunatics such as "Christian" mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik, would support legislation banning worship on either Friday or Saturday reveals a profound lack of understanding the European way of thinking.

Aage

Sirje Walkowiak - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 05:12

Sirje, you obviously don't understand how the calendar works. The flow of days did not get disrupted, only the numbering of days got changed. The weekly cycle has continued unbroken since Creation in around 4004BC until now. Especially ever since Christ's time, it's there is clear evidence that the cycle is unbroken.

Pagophilus,

You obviously don't understand how the Bible sets up how to tell time and when to observe f holy days.

  1. Gen.1:14 God created "lights" in the sky (stars, sun, moon) "AND LET THEM BE FOR SIGNS AND FOR SEASONS AND FOR DAYS AND YEARS" -
  2. Ps. 104:19 "HE MADE THE MOON FOR THE SEASONS" translation- for telling time)
  3. Is. 66:23 (The famous SDA proof that the Sabbath is to be kept in the "new earth" (heaven) - "AND IT SHALL BE FROM NEW MOON TO NEW MOON AND FROM SABBATH TO SABBATH ALL MANKIND WILL COME TO BOW DOWN BEFORE ME"
  4. Before the Roman calendar, each new month started with the appearance of the "new moon". The Sabbath was calculated from that day. Compared to our calendar, the Sabbath, therefore, would fall on different days each month.
  5. Hillel II changed the Jewish calendar based on the new moon to a fixed day calendar demanded by the Romans ( c 360 CE).
  6. From "Hebrew for Christians (www.hebrew4christians.com) :
    The emergence of the moon- from darkness to light- is a picture of God's salvation for the Jewish people and our personal deliverance from darkness to light.

    In Talmudic times, the day marking the New Moon was fixed by actual observation by at least two witnesses. As soon as the new moon was visible as a waxing crescent, the Sanhedrin in Israel was informed (by the blowing of trumpets from mountain top to the next) and Rosh Chodesh was formally announced (this system was later discarded in favor of the fixed calendar developed by Hillel II (c360 CE), which has been in use to the present day.) The day after the new moon was sighted was a festival, heralded with sounding of the shofar and commemorated with convocations and sacrifices. Knowing precisely when Rosh Chodesh began was critical to the order of the appointed times commanded by the Lord. In fact, the entire Jewish calendar was depende4nt upon knowing when Rosh Chodesh began, and without this information the set times for the festivals and holidays would be lost. Therefore, during times of persecution, the Jews were often forbidden to observe Rosh Chodesh as well as Shabbat, in order keep them from obeying God.

Tom Zwemer - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 05:29

For sure Adventism can be faulted on its emphasis on "getting ready" and the soon return of Jesus.

It is the check list mentality and the fear motive that are open to critical comment.

I recall shortly after sundown on a Sabbath. I was a student at the University of Illinois College of Dentistry. That Sabbath, I attended Sabbath School and Church a Broadview Academy and spent the afternoon with friends on campus. Shortly after sundown, a crowd of students were gathered a the curb of the highway in front of the campus. I decided to walk over to see what the great interest was.

I was told, I just missed it. A recent graduate had stopped by on his new motorcycle. Just as I arrived
he took off in a cloud of dust. Moments later, a breathless student arrived and said. The cyclist was dead! Seems that two block up the highway was a stop light. The rider couldn't stop. He hit the rear of the car ahead. The rider was thrown over the car, landed on his head on the pavement and was dead on impact.

To that rider the return of Jesus is just a nano-second away. Was he ready? Did he have his check-list up to date?

A much better view of the Christian life is expressed by Dr. Fred Craddock Professor Emeritus of homilectics at Emory. He says: "He always takes the doxology with him!"

I first learned of the return of Jesus some 80 years ago. For me that return will occur within the decade.

There is a gospel song that has a line. "Can the world see Jesus in you?"

While in the army, fellow soldiers would give me the raspberries, until the infiltration course or in combat when the risks were high. Then they would say: "Tom, can I stay close to you?" The first time I answered: "of course, but why?" The reply would be because, the Lord won't let anything bad happen to you, so I want to be as close as possible." I laughed and would say: I don't think it works that way for either of us.

Sanctification is taking the doxology with you every where you go. "Our lives are in His hands who said: ' a whole I planned, see all and be not afraid!"

Yes scoff at check lists and human predictions---but take the doxology with you.

Tom Z

Dick Larsen - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 06:16

Sirje, I find the calendar topic intriguing but in one of the links you sent me it was explained that the weekly cycle functioned completely independent of the new moon/festival cycle.

Sirje Walkowiak - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 06:56

Dick,
in one of the links you sent me it was explained that the weekly cycle functioned completely independent of the new moon/festival cycle.

Right now it does. The first day of each month started with the appearance of the new crescent moon. There are a couple of days each month when the moon is not visible at all. So when it appeared again, the ancient Hebrews started counting by sevens to identifiably the Sabbaths for that month. If you were to check the weekly cycle set up by the moon even now, you would find that the Sabbath would come on different days (by our calendar) each month. Those calendars are available in The Farmer's Almanac and, of course, the INTERNET.

Sirje Walkowiak - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 07:13

Dick,
Check this out:

http:lunarsabbath.com/

http://www.hope-of-israel.org/sideside.htm

Sirje Walkowiak - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 07:15

The first one should read:

http://www.lunarsabbath.com/

Anonymous1 - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 08:01

The lunarsabbath approach seems legalistic and jot-and-tittle focused.

Aage Rendalen - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 08:32

Anonymous1
And, of course, incredibly impractical, which is probably why the Jewish community opted for the Roman calendar. But it also shows that if Adventists want to keep on talking about "the little horn" changing the commandments of God relative to the day of worship, they will have to include themselves as participants in that supposed conspiracy against the will of God. Nobody today keeps the Biblical sabbath.

Aage

Michael - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 08:36

Not only that but its completely wrong. If you look back at the ancient texts you will find there were no daily names for these supposed "extra days" of the week that supposedly occurred while they were waiting for the new weekly cycle to "calibrate" every new moon.

In short they never calibrated the week to the moon. They calibrated the month to the moon. As a month it has no weekly connotation, the month simply got longer or shorter. It wasn't until much later that the system of a short month and later a leap year day made the annual calendar as precise as possible.

The 10 commandments were written with Gods own finger and there was no caveat exceptions to his plain the "seventh day...."
Just because they had certain other ceremonial "sabbaths" that occurred on days other than the 7th does not have any effect on the 10 commandment Sabbath or the 7 day weekly progression.

Michael

Sirje Walkowiak - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 08:46

Michael,
Unless someone was designated to sit in a tent and count by sevens, starting with Adam, there is no way a continued cycle of sevens has remained throughout history. If you were stranded on an island without your ipad how would you keep the weekly cycle?

I know its difficult to realize that the day the Sabbath is being kept has changed as much as the day of worship (Sunday). We are going to fight tooth and nail to prove it doesn't matter - just like the Sunday keepers when presented with the Sabbath, but you must admit the irony of our position about Sunday is inescapable.

As for your problem about those lost days when the moon isn't visible - well, too bad. That is the way it was set up in the Bible.

Sirje Walkowiak - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 08:49

The lunarsabbath approach seems legalistic and jot-and-tittle focused.M/em> Anonymous1

Where have we heard that criticism before? - Oh, I know - from those who leave the Revelation Seminars just after the Sabbath session was presented.

Elaine Nelson - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 09:06

If we today were to use the exact formula that the Jews used when the sabbath was first given them, we would end up worshiping every day of the week.

Only because it became impractical, were the changes made, as Sirje wrote, in the early years of the Christian era.

To state, as has so often been repeated, that the 7-day weekly cycle has never been broken, may be correct, but the Sabbath was calculated by the cycles of the moon, which everyone knows, does not equal the same cycles of our modern calendar. Without calendars, the Jews used the moon for most of their feasts, of which the Sabbath was one. "He made the moon for the seasons" (Ps.104:19), (See Lev. 23 for the method of calculating all of the solemn festivals--all calculated by the month, which, in turn, was by the moon.

Before the Roman calendar, each month started with the appearance of the "new moon." The Sabbath was calculated from that day. Compared to our calendar, the Sabbath, there, would fall on different days each month.

With the availability of the internet, no longer can such erroneous statements be made that the Sabbath has been unchanged and the same day since Creation. It has been celebrated every day of the week. Where is the evidence?

Elaine

hopeful - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 10:53

So if this alliance--or anything else--were a sign of the end, shouldn't we rejoice? Why do we say we want Jesus to return, but panic & fight off any hint of it?

____________________________________________________
"be reverent in behavior, not slanderers nor enslaved to much wine, teachers of that which is good" titus 2:3

Thomas. - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 16:03

Hmmm, is calculating the Sabbath's by the moon any more legalistic than calculating it by the calendar?

To have community rituals and celebrations tied in with natural phenomena is a beautiful way to be connected to nature and the cycles of life and makes lots of sense in any society, but especially pre-literacy ones.

Sirje Walkowiak - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 19:20

To have community rituals and celebrations tied in with natural phenomena is a beautiful way to be connected to nature and the cycles of life and makes lots of sense in any society, but especially pre-literacy ones. Thomas

Absolutely. When I first came into the church, I found those "sunset calendars" very odd - cold and mechanical in a way. The whole idea about calculating time from sunset to sunset means you can see when the sun sets. It's not about the exact minute - it's a whole phenomenon and experience of the sun setting - a season of time. To nail it down to the minute where your friends thirty miles away begin the Sabbath a few minutes earlier or later always seemed artificial to me.

When I was a kid, our family would spend two weeks at a lake in northern Ontario (Canada) where my aunt had a summer cottage. At first, there was no electricity since it was on an island. When friends got together, we'd sit and talk until you'd notice that it was almost dark and some one then lit a lamp or a candle. The whole experience of bringing the day to a close in this way was spiritual even then, without any religious overtones involved. As a child I thought of it as an almost magical time. Counting down to sunset (on either side of the Sabbath) was way too cold.

We are, after all, part of nature, which speaks louder to some of us than others, but back before time became so precisely calculated there was no other way to give structure to it - the stars above - and the travels of the sun and moon across the sky - that's all they had.

Most-lem - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 19:30

Why, then, in all moslem countries sundays (and christmas day) are the official weekly holidays--but why not fridays?
Remember, God raised up Islam centuries ago to protect Protestanism from being persecuted. BTW, that's why God allowed the ignorance up. Another extrem La ila ha illa or whatever something like that...they always proclaiming that there is only one God.
However, before the close of probation, Islam will not excluded from polarization. There must be only 2 groups of people: God's people or Evil's

Corran Vincent - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 19:36

How do we know that creation was 4004BC, If you count up the genealogical of the Bible in 2 different parts of the Bibles they DON"T match up. How did The Reverent Ussher decide creation happen at 4am on the morning of Oct 23rd was it? He was just guessing

TruthWave - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 22:38

The fact that Jesus kept the 7th day Sabbath on the same day as the Jews in his time proves that it was the correct day to keep the Sabbath on. And ever since then the Jews being meticulous time keepers never lost count of which day the Sabbath falls.

The truth and nothing but the truth.

TruthWave - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 22:44

This is issue is so simple, yet you make it so complex. God's Ten Commandments were not given to only those with collegiate degrees and access to volumes of reference books. No, they were given to the common people around the world. The God that I serve made the Sabbath so simple that a 12 year old child can keep it correctly just by reading the plain words of the Bible and knowing basic history. Confusing the issue with Lunar Sabbaths is a ploy of the devil to discourage and distract from keeping the 7th day holy. Satan is not stupid, and the Lunar Sabbath is one of the rabbits that he has pulled out of the hate to make complicated something that is so simple.

The truth and nothing but the truth.

Tony Romeo - Fri, 08/05/2011 - 23:44

Alicia - I think I love you. I know Jesus loves the both of us. Best regards - Tony Romeo, Pastor / NYC

RF - Sat, 08/06/2011 - 00:54

TruthWave!
You miss the point. When Jesus walked on this earth the Jews still followed the lunar calender.
RF

hopeful - Sat, 08/06/2011 - 01:03

Whatever the questions about the origins of the seven-day week, I think we need better scholarship than what's being offered by Lunar Sabbath groups.

On the originator--
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_David_Brown

____________________________________________________
"be reverent in behavior, not slanderers nor enslaved to much wine, teachers of that which is good" titus 2:3

Dean Waterman - Sat, 08/06/2011 - 03:37

"Such a law has no religious overtones."

Are we reading the same thing?

Dean Waterman - Sat, 08/06/2011 - 03:42

There comes a time where you just have to let it go and live as you know God is calling you. I grew up SDA, and experienced many of the same things, but I don't adhere to everything, and I don't throw stones at it either. There is much truth in what you say, even if said tongue-in-cheek.

Sirje Walkowiak - Sat, 08/06/2011 - 05:18

hopeful - Sat, 08/06/2011 - 01:03
Whatever the questions about the origins of the seven-day week, I think we need better scholarship than what's being offered by Lunar Sabbath groups.

hopeful,
I'm not advocating the SDA church start keeping lunar Sabbaths. What I am pointing out with this discussion is that the SDA message to the world needs a healthy dose of humility. Ever since the 1800s we have been plummeting the rest of the Protestant world with accusations of "following the beast" and forecasting dire prophesies about people who are worshiping God the only way they know how - by going to church on Sunday.

We have elaborate charts depicting horrendous beasts rising from the sea, or wherever, and try to scare people into the church - BECAUSE, we are the only people on earth who go to church on the right day - the Sabbath. This Sabbath, we claim, was instituted at creation and will be kept into eternity in heaven (new earth).

The truth of the whole matter is - the Sabbath that is kept on Saturdays is as much the result of time manipulation by the Romans, way back when they created a calendar by which their Roman world could operate on a uniform time schedule. Saturday is the seventh day of the Roman week. If you really want to keep the Sabbath, proclaimed at Sinai and kept by Jesus himself, you would have to go back to calculating the Sabbath by the lunar calendar. It doesn't matter what reprehensible characters also keep it, the fact of history is that, that is how time was managed by the Hebrews (and others) before there was a calendar in their tents; and before someone drew a line in the Pacific ocean to separate one day from the next.

If we want to keep Saturday as the Sabbath - fine; but let's let others keep Sunday, or Tuesday, or every day (if they're retired) without stoning them to death.

One person regards one day above another, another regards every day alike. Each person must be fully convinced in his own mind. He who observes the day, observes it for the Lord, and he who eats, does so for the Lord. - Romans 14.

Aage Rendalen - Sat, 08/06/2011 - 06:12

Sirje, that is indeed the point. Nobody follows the ancient Hebrew way of calculating time, and there is no reason anybody should, given that we have more practical ways of organizing time. But that also means, as you point out, that creating a religious identity around keeping the 7th day of the Roman calendar is misguided.

Aage

MH - Sat, 08/06/2011 - 06:18

So maybe in our age we have multiple sabbaths, like in the age of the patriarchs, they had multiple wives and concubines. Both seemingly go against our understanding of the ten commandments. Maybe God is hoping we'll finally see something he's been trying to show us for millennia.

Sirje Walkowiak - Sat, 08/06/2011 - 06:36

Maybe God is hoping we'll finally see something he's been trying to show us for millennia.

I think so. That something is the Gospel message, minus the "holier than thou because I keep the correct day" attitude - not, necessarily of each SDA, but of the entire SDA paradigm. It's a haughty message, wrought with scarey tactics that include fire and brimstone, and smidgeon of painful agony thrown in for good measure.

George Tichy - Sat, 08/06/2011 - 08:15

"May be,... May be,... May be..."
This is the only thing I read in all religious blogs. The uncertainty is evident, and becoming worse!

Blessed the day when I understood that it is much healthier to adopt the Agnostic position, and be courageous enough to say, "I don't know!" when I really don't know. This makes more sense than just inserting some new futile, baseless theory on and off to explain the mysteries of the Universe and life, then adding the word FAITH to it. "You must accept it by faith"...

Too many explanations that actually explain nothing. And, for everything else, there is always ... "Master....Faith"...

Note: I am giving myself the first "vote up"...just in case...

Sirje Walkowiak - Sat, 08/06/2011 - 09:33

George,
Yes, the operative word is FAITH - that's all there can be. For some the faith is in their church and its message; and fear at the uncertainty makes them even more strident about the manufactured certitude - and lines are drawn - and people are sacrificed at those alters of fear ("believe this or get out").

However, any rational person will have to admit that, as science states - "something can't come from nothing". You're here - I'm here - we both have a modicum of intelligence, enough to know we're here, so I have to have faith that some form of intelligence placed us here - therein is God. Each of us must take it from there ....

Or not .... that is the choice.

George Tichy - Sat, 08/06/2011 - 09:56

Sirje,
Agree with you on this. The reality that we are surely here is undeniable.
The possible explanations for our existence are several, though. And ALL of them require "faith" to be accepted/believed, because nobody was there when things happened.
I actually don't have a problem with "faith", I have a problem with people using faith as an absolute value. This is wrong.

Faith is just faith. Imposing a belief on others, or as you said, "sacrificing them at those altars of fear" is the problem in organized religion. Statements of "absolute certainty" about issues that are actually uncertain, unknown, irrelevant, or dubious is what compromises religious systems. ADventism not being excluded - actually it seems worse among us due the way EGW's writings have been used (both the ones of her own and those she copied from prior sources...)

I wonder if it possible to develop a religious system where every person (member...) is allowed to understand the Universal issues by him/hersel without being scolded or literally persecuted.
I doubt!

Sirje Walkowiak - Sat, 08/06/2011 - 10:36

George,
"Religious systems" don't allow what you're suggesting; however, there can be, and I believe there is, a community of "faithers" who can have conversations without dogma - where faith in all things good that placed us here, can be trusted to be fair (at a judgment) and gracious (at the foot of the cross).

Someone is going to peg me as an agnostic, but I don't hesitate to acknowledge, perhaps a blind faith, in a risen Christ. It seems that all the other crutches the church passes out to keep us limping through their doors have crumbled, and all I'm, left with is the cross and the empty tomb. That may not be the answer for you (I don't know); but we each have to deal with these things alone, perhaps in the middle of a dark night. - Wow, I'm sounding morose - don't mean to. The point is, we have to struggle with these issue individually, and help each other deal with it. Most "religious systems" end up working for their own survival and miss the point of their existence.

Dave M - Sat, 08/06/2011 - 14:14

George Tichy,

Sounds like you might want to look into unitarian universalism:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitarian_Universalism

Elaine Nelson - Sat, 08/06/2011 - 14:38

There is much about unitarian-universalism that I find attractive. But after being a life-long SDA member, when I left some 25 years ago I've never once regretted the move and have no intention of ever being affiliated with any particular religion. Why? I can think of no possible reason.

Elaine

S Styrra - Sat, 08/06/2011 - 15:13

I find the unitarian-universalist to spirituality highly relevant and intellectually, socially and spiritually very healthy.

From the above link -

Unitarian Universalists affirm and promote:

- The inherent worth and dignity of every person;
- Justice, equity and compassion in human relations;
- Acceptance of one another and encouragement to spiritual growth in our congregations;
- A free and responsible search for truth and meaning;
- The right of conscience and the use of the democratic process within our congregations and in society at large;
- The goal of world community with peace, liberty and justice for all;
- Respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.

*** These sound very much like Adventism's religious liberty organisation and Liberty magazines ethos!

Unitarian Universalists place emphasis on spiritual growth and development. Unitarian Universalism is a creedless religion.

The "sources" upon which current practice is based:

- Direct experience of that transcending mystery and wonder, affirmed in all cultures, which moves us to a renewal of the spirit and an openness to the forces which create and uphold life;
- Words and deeds of prophetic women and men which challenge us to confront powers and structures of evil with justice, compassion, and the transforming power of love;
- Wisdom from the world's religions which inspires us in our ethical and spiritual life;
- Jewish and Christian teachings which call us to respond to God's love by loving our neighbors as ourselves;
- Humanist teachings which counsel us to heed the guidance of reason and the results of science, and warn us against idolatries of the mind and spirit.
- Spiritual teachings of earth-centered traditions which celebrate the sacred circle of life and instruct us to live in harmony with the rhythms of nature.

Alicia - Sat, 08/06/2011 - 15:17

The best of Adventist values leads me to affirm these principles of UU. The worst in Adventism would condemn it because it is not Adventism!

George Tichy - Sat, 08/06/2011 - 18:41

Oh, Oh... It seems that ADventism may be losing to the competition, isn't I???

Dennis Fischer - Sun, 08/07/2011 - 16:09

Although the Lord's Day (the weekly Easter) is a very special day for Christ-followers around the world, there are no holy days in the Christian calendar in the sense that the festal, weekly Sabbath (Lev. 23:1-3) was for the Hebrew people. The Bible makes it very clear that Jesus is the true Sabbath Rest (Matt.11:28-30; Rom. 14:5, Col. 2:16-17; Heb. 4:9-10). Those who still insist upon observing any shadow pointing to Cross are actually denying the reality of Christ. Indeed, the inspired writers of the New Testament never even once listed "Sabbath-breaking" as a sin.

The SDA teaching of an imminent National Sunday Law is more remote and unthinkable today than ever before. With separate Jewish and Islamic days of rest, these major religions are certainly not about to observe the Lord's Day instead. Interestingly, Ellen White never warned her followers about the Islamic invasion happening today.

Elaine Nelson - Sun, 08/07/2011 - 16:37

Dennis, Being logical is not always welcomed here. Of course, there was never a designated "Christian holy day" comparable to the Jew's sabbath. It is rather quaint that Adventism
revived the 7th day as a sabbath without also adding all the specific types of activites that were prohibited on that day, not the penalties which were usually death.

Christ has become our rest, and there is not a single word in the NT outlining a day for Christians to observe. Which hasn't hindered Adventists from "assuming" that some of the writers simply "failed" to mention it and we should assume that the Jewish practice continued, uninterrupted, with the Gentiles who were pagans with no such habits. We all know the definition of assume.

Elaine

billman - Sun, 08/07/2011 - 21:00

I requested of Yisrael on the facebook lunar sabbath group many months ago any scholarly work that he was aware of that supported the notion of the lunar sabbath. The response was more screeds of the stuff that people with a fire and brimstone mentality are likely to foist upon the uncommited. I'm not saying what I received was fire and brimstone - it was simply as well thought through, or not, as the stuff that usually passes as well researched among the laity.

If there is any scholarly material on the lunar sabbath, I would like to see it.

Sirje Walkowiak - Mon, 08/08/2011 - 03:51

billman,
The only "scholarly work" needed for this topic is a tiny bit of common sense, and a tad of elementary science.

Enter logic - how would any society keep track of TIME without clocks and calendars?

Sirje Walkowiak - Mon, 08/08/2011 - 09:06
Elaine Nelson - Mon, 08/08/2011 - 09:34

Many sources are available on the Internet about the lunar based Sabbath.

One is: Hope of Isarel Ministries "The New Moon and the Weekly Sabbath--Side-By-Side! (simply Google this title). In addition are these many Bible texts:
2 Kings 4:23
2 Chron 24:31
2 Chron 2:4
2 Chron 8:13
Is. 1:13
Is. 66:23

According to "Babylonian Menologies and the Semitic Calendars":

"The days 7,14, 21, 12 in the Babylonian calendar of the seventh century obviously constitute the seven-day divion of the month. This scheme is fully carried out somewhere BETWEEN 1000 B.C. and 600 B.C. Here the weeks DO NOT continue in a regular cycle REGARDLESS of the new moon. Each month has four weeks, beginning with the new moon. Days 29 and 30, or in case of a 29-day month, day 29 are simply thrown out (figuratively) of the fourth-week system. (This can still be seen in the Jewish calendars of today.) Every month must begin with the first day of the first week....The instiitution of days 7, 14, 21, and 28 of every month as rest-days was then carried out after 100 B.C. The idea obtained up to that period and time included day 11, New Moon, days 9+19, and days 29,30, Dark of the moon. All of these were thrown out to obtain a seven-day week throughout the year in the reformation of the calendar about 700 B.C."

Additional Bible texts associating the New Moon and Sabbath:

Ex. 46:3
Col. 2:16

Finally, it is a fact that our English word "week" comes from the Teutonic word for change--indicating the change of the phases of the moon. So even the word we commonly use today in the English language contains a distant memory of its original place in God's true calendar. The very simplicity (something absolutely necessary in an era without calendars), becomes apparent when we understand that God's weekly Sabbath days fall on the phases of the moon--and NOT on a set day in man's humanly-devised calendar.

Adventists would have no knowledge of Sabbath were it not for the preservation of the Jewish Scriptures, yet refuse to acknowledge the TIME of Sabbath that was specifically instituted by God to calculate Sabbath!

Elaine

RF - Mon, 08/08/2011 - 10:17

See also Hope-of-israel.org/sabfloat.htm
RF

billman - Wed, 08/10/2011 - 00:11

Thanks everyone for your comments.

Sirje, if it was simply a matter of a bit of commonsence and some elementary science, I would have anticipated that opponents of the SDA church would have been bandying around the lunar sabbath as clear evidence that adventists were out of their tree. While one can find a lot of material on various calendars, not much really refers to the seven day cycle.

I shall enjoy reviewing the above links.

Sirje Walkowiak - Wed, 08/10/2011 - 03:50

billman,
We can't be promoting something like the Saturday Sabbath by default, basing it on a lack of opposition. Who ever thinks of lunar calendars these days. The seven day cycle is in the Bible and the Roman calendar. The issue is when do you start the count - which day is the first day of the month? Without a calendar popping up on your computer you wouldn't know. These guys had only the sun, moon, and stars to navigate by and to tell the passing of time. Besides that, the Bible clearly sets up the moon as the basis for setting their festivals and their Sabbaths.

As I've said before, I'm not out to change the Sabbath to a lunar Sabbath - just pointing out that the Sabbath we keep is just as much the invention of Rome as is Sunday worship. Who wants to cast the first stone?

Alicia - Wed, 08/10/2011 - 04:15

Deuteronomy and Leviticus would like to cast the first stone, as well as the enemies of Jesus!

Sirje Walkowiak - Wed, 08/10/2011 - 09:21

"Deuteronomy and Leviticus would like to cast the first stone, as well as the enemies of Jesus!"

Whatever that means?!?

Nathan Huggins - Wed, 08/10/2011 - 17:30

Can the universal sunday law start out as something so innocent as a "family rest day", I believe so. I have known about this for quite some time now, but I thought this would be a good column to post this link because of the significance of the topic at hand. Something to think about for the next 10 months or so.

http://www.cbcisite.com/cbcinews4669.htm

Elaine Nelson - Wed, 08/10/2011 - 18:30

How many evangelists have reminded listeners that there has never been a break in the weely cycle and the same seventh day kept by God in Eden, is exactly the seventh which is observed today! Sadly, how many gullible have believed this--which is an impossibility for several reasons:

No one kept a record from Creation to Sinai as no one observed the seventh day UNTIL Sinai. When it was given there, it was always computed by the moon, the only possible metric those people had without clocks or calendars. The sun marked the year and days and the moon marked the Sabbath, which were it observed that way today would be falling on every day of the week.

Today, most people begin the year on the fictitious date of Jan 1st, which has nothing to do with the sun or moon. Months vary between 28-31 days instead of according to the actual lunar cycle of 29.5 days (20 or 30 altermately. Many begin their day at 12:00 AM rather than sunset.

When the International Date Line (man-made) was finalized, it was man who arbitrarily decided when the Sabbath began and ends. In essence, man places himself in the place of God as the one sets apart, or sanctifies a day.

Each individual who has an allegiance to observing the Fourth Commandment, should do his own research, which is simple with the internet today, and there are almost endless sources on many sites (many of which Sirje has supplied and I have read) for a thorough evaluation. Even the Jewish calendar is shown for those Orthodox Jews who observe the lunar calendar. There is no end of ignorance regarding Sabbath and its true origin that those who are much better informed are unable to give any credibility to those who choose to remain in ignorance.

Since it is impossible to maintain a seven-day week since Creation, how important is a 7th day when it is God who should be worshiped and not reverence for a day which no one validate is a continual 7-day sequential day since then? Does God not accept our time unless it is specified by the calendar?
Has the sabbath been made an icon with more reverence than the One who should be worshiped?

Elaine

hopeful - Wed, 08/10/2011 - 19:09

Instead of the Sabbath question, I'm more interested in the origin of the seven-day week, which isn't easily explained by moon & sun cycles. This is a fun resource: http://www.webexhibits.org/calendars/week.html

____________________________________________________
"be reverent in behavior, not slanderers nor enslaved to much wine, teachers of that which is good" titus 2:3

Dennis Fischer - Sat, 01/14/2012 - 10:46

Since Seventh-day Adventist officials in Samoa have recently voted to observe Sunday for their weekly day of worship, will they change "Sabbath School" to "Sunday School" as well? Moreover, with both non-Adventists and Adventists now worshiping on Sunday in Samoa, the threat of the "mark of the beast" loses its power and punch. Obviously, Samoan non-Adventists can no longer be rudely referred to as the "whores of Babylon" and as "apostate Protestants" by their SDA friends.

Dennis Fischer
Lincoln, Nebraska USA

Fr. Jim - Sat, 01/14/2012 - 10:50

There is nothing nefarious going on here. Most people in Europe are still Christian to one degree or another. In Israel Saturday laws are enforced on everyone. In Muslim nations it's Friday. There is no problem with religious accommodation of other days in the West. The real tension comes from Islamic groups wanting to implement sharia law.

Jason Taylor - Mon, 03/05/2012 - 16:24

Hello Elaine,

You said “Each individual who has an allegiance to observing the Fourth Commandment, should do his own research…”

First, you just said the “key” words, “Fourth Commandment”. Thus, it is a COMMANDMENT. Just like the other nine. God gave Ten Commandments in his law, therefore, if his law still stands then his Commandments do as well, all of them.

Christ said “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil…Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven”.

You also said "No one kept a record from Creation to Sinai as no one observed the seventh day UNTIL Sinai"

Answer: God kept record of the sabbath, and he reminded his people of the Sabbath even before they left Egypt (Exodus 5:4-5). Also, after leaving Egypt, while in the wilderness (Exodus chapter 16)

You also said "There is no end of ignorance regarding Sabbath and its true originis matter.

We don't need to be ignorant on this matter:

1.God commanded us to keep the seventh day Sabbath according to the fourth Commandment. God would never command us to do so if we could not possibly know how or what day.

2.Adam and Eve knew and kept the Sabbath (Genesis 2:3). The Jews of the Old Testament knew and kept the Sabbath (Exodus 16:25). Jesus knew and kept that same Sabbath (Luke 4:16). The apostles even kept the Sabbath AFTER Jesus death and resurrection (Acts 17:2).

3.The Sabbath is traced throughout bible history and passed down to their children and children’s children. Therefore, because the Sabbath is passed down to the succeeding generations, it is impossible for an entire nation to lose track of a day, unless the ENTIRE nation fell of the face of the earth at the same time.

Finally, you say “Has the Sabbath been made an icon with more reverence than the One who should be worshiped”

The Sabbath does not have more reverence than the One who made the day. However, the One who made the day gave it relevance. For God said “Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy” Exodus 20:8. It’s not about the day it’s about the God that sanctified the day. It’s about loving and obeying God, and because it’s a commandment it must and should be obeyed. The Sabbath points to God as the Creator. For it reads “For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day, and hallowed it.” Exodus 20:11. The Sabbath is a memorial of creation (“when God rested from all that HE created and made”. Genesis 2:3), even as 4th of July is a memorial of independence. Therefore, when we honor the Sabbath we honor the God of creation, even as those that keep the 4th of July honor this country’s independence. Let it be known, we should ALWAYS honor God everyday; however, the Sabbath is a day in which we honor AND REST to spend COMPLETELY WITH GOD. Not on any day we choose, but on the day which God commands, because that is his special day. God call it "his holy day" Isaiah 58:13 & Revelation 1:10.

Elaine Nelson - Mon, 03/05/2012 - 17:42

John,

Some questions for you:

There is nothing at all in Gen. 2:3 about Adam and Eve observing sabbath. Ony that God completed his work and He rested, no mention of the pair doing the same.

Please trace the record of sabbath being observed until Sinai (chapter and verse).

Jesus came to FULFILL the law. When a law or covenant is fulfilled, all the obligations have been met and it is no longer applicable. If you owe a debt, under the law you are obligated to pay that debt. Once it is paid, that law no longer applies to you. Jesus said on the cross: "It is finished." He finished, fulfilled, and completed all the demands of the Law.

The fourth commandment is the only one of the ten that is time-specific. Morals are not limited to time but always apply. Sabbath is a special festival or ceremony (see Lev. 23) and cannot be considered part of a moral law. Do those who break the sixth rightfully considered immoral; the same applies to all the rest, but those Gentiles who do not observe the sabbath cannot be considered immoral, because they were never given the Decalogue; it was only given to the Israelites to remind them of their deliverance from Egypt, which is why it never applied to anyone but the Jews (nor was it given to their ancestors).

Christians were never given a sabbath or special day to observe; there is nothing in the NT after Pentecost giving Gentiles who became Christians that there was a special day that must be observed. They could not break the fourth commandment because it never applied to them. There is only a Jewish sabbath, given to the Jews, and observed by the Jews or those who are guided by the Hebrew, rather than NT scriptures.

In Rev. 1:10 mentions the "Lord's Day" a Greek word never used for sabbath so it cannot be assumed that it was referring to the seventh day. Is.58:13 is addressed to the Israelites who had been trampling sabbath; no such reprimands can be found in the NT and especially directed to Christians. Context is too often ignored.

Elaine

Elaine Nelson - Mon, 03/05/2012 - 17:44

Jason, I apologize for addressing you as John.

Elaine

Horatio - Mon, 03/05/2012 - 18:05

"When a law or covenant is fulfilled, all the obligations have been met and it is no longer applicable." Elaine, your argument about Christ fulfilling the law falls flat. Using your logic, we are also no longer under any obligation to keep the other commandments. I am free to steal, lie, dishonor my parents, etc. To take the Sabbath commandment and treat it differently than the other 9 makes no sense either logically or Biblically. Fulfilling the law is not the same thing as abolishing it. He fulfilled the ceremonial law because it pointed forward to Him; and He fulfilled the moral law in that He kept it perfectly.

If Christians were "never given a sabbath or special day to observe," then why are so many Christians so adamant about Sunday observance and so opposed to Sabbath observance? If there is no special day, then it shouldn't matter to anyone what day I observe. Wednesday would be convenient for me. But that's not the real issue. There's some pride and tradition involved. It's very hard to admit that you've been keeping the wrong day for almost 2000 years.

Elaine Nelson - Mon, 03/05/2012 - 19:50

Christians are not so adamant about Sunday observance, certainly not as certain as Adventists about Sabbath. I agree, it shouldn't matter what day is observed, and Paul gave that freedom: "Let everyone be persuaded in his own mind." He also instructed the Gentile believers: 'Let no one act as your judge in reegard to food or drink in respect to a festival or a new moon or sabbath day." Each time the Bible has such a list it is always in this order: yearly, monthly and weekly events or reverse order: Daily, monthly or yearly events.

How do you explain Paul's statements to new Gentile Christians? Is the Old Testament to be our most important guide to living, or the New Testament that fully reveals Christ?

Elaine

Bill Newell - Mon, 03/05/2012 - 20:26

Hi Elaine,
I take your point about Paul's statement, but "fulfil" also can mean to carry out an obligation completely. In the quote attributed to Jesus that he came not to destroy the law but to fulfil, I don't think you can say it meant "I came not to destroy the law but to do away with it"

Jim Roberts - Mon, 03/05/2012 - 20:48

This thread is evidence of the evolution and spread of Calvinistic antinomianism

Elaine Nelson - Mon, 03/05/2012 - 20:49

Yes, either Jesus came to fulfil his obligation, or it was not fulfilled. He either inaugurated a new covenant or he did not. Hebrews explains: "He brings a new covenant. Now wherever a will is in question, the death of the testator must be established,.. He abolishes the first to replace it with the second. By speaking of a new covenant, he implies that the first one is already old. Now anyuthing old only gets more antiquated until in the end it disappears. His death took place to cancel the sins that infringed the earlier covenant. Now wherever a will is in question, the death of the testator must be established; indeed it only beomes valid with that death."

The conditions of that first covenant have all been fulfilled and the new covenant replaced it. The Law was part of the old covenant, dead letters written in stone. The Law was only a tutor to lead us to Christ. Now that Christ has come, we are no longer under a tutor. The Law is not of faith.

Elaine

Jason - Mon, 03/05/2012 - 23:51

Hello Elaine, it's Ok you called me John. (I know this is alot, but please read this Elaine,please)

You say “There is nothing at all in Gen. 2:3 about Adam and Eve observing sabbath. Ony that God completed his work and He rested, no mention of the pair doing the same”.

Christ said “The Sabbath was made for man” Mark 2:27. Adam and Eve were created on the sixth day, and then the very next day, God instituted the Sabbath. That is why Christ said that it was made for man because it was made for the first man and woman, and there seed after them. God would not have instituted the Sabbath at that time unless it applied at that time.

You say “Please trace the record of sabbath being observed until Sinai (chapter and verse)”.

Answer: First, remember how God started off the fourth commandment by saying “REMEMBER”. To say “remember” means they were already aware of it. It means to “recall” something. Before God even gave the Ten Commandment law in the wilderness (Exodus chapter 20), the Jews were aware of the Sabbath before they left Egypt (Exodus 5:4-5). Also, Exodus 16 was before Sinai as well. Also, God said about Abraham “Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws (Genesis 26:5). This also proves that God’s law was made known before Sinai. Also, God said “keep it holy”. God already made it holy when he “sanctified” it after the six days of creation and told them to “keep it” the way he made it.

Also you say “Jesus came to FULFILL the law. When a law or covenant is fulfilled, all the obligations have been met and it is no longer applicable. If you owe a debt, under the law you are obligated to pay that debt. Once it is paid, that law no longer applies to you. Jesus said on the cross: "It is finished." He finished, fulfilled, and completed all the demands of the Law”.

Let me first start this one by saying, the debt Christ paid was not the law, but the transgression of the law. Christ did not die to give us a license to sin. The law is applicable for Christ said that he did come to “destroy the law”. Therefore, the word “fulfill” does not mean to destroy or do away with, it means to “fill to the full”.

There was a law that was nailed to the cross, but it was not the law of God.
It is written “Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross” (Colossians 2:14). According to this verse it was the “handwriting of ordinances” that was nailed to the cross, not the handwriting of God. These “handwriting of ordinances” are declared to be the handwriting of Moses. For it is written “Neither will I any more remove the foot of Israel from out of the land which I have appointed for your fathers; so that they will take heed to do all that I have commanded them, according to the whole law and the statutes and the ordinances by the hand of Moses (2 Chronicles 33:8). However, the Ten Commandments were the writing of God, and not of Moses. For it is written; “the tables were the work of God, and the writing was the writing of God, graven upon the tables” (Exodus 32:16).
It is most important to understand the difference between these two laws. Again, one law was upon “two tables of stone written with the finger of God” (Deuteronomy 9:10). The other law was written by the hand of Moses. For it is written “when Moses made an end of writing the words of this law in a book, until they were finished, that Moses commanded the Levites, which bare the ark of the covenant of the Lord, saying, take this book of the law, and put it in the side of the ark of the covenant of the Lord your God, that it may be there for a witness against thee” (Deuteronomy 31:24-26).
Notice according to Deuteronomy 31:24-25 how the law that Moses wrote with his own hand was placed “in the side of the ark of the covenant”. However, the law that God wrote was placed “INTO the ark”, not in the side. For it is written; “And thou shalt put INTO the ark, the testimony which I shall give” (Exodus 25:16). Now, just to be clear that this “testimony” that was placed INTO the ark was the Ten Commandments, let’s read Exodus 31:18; “And he (God) gave unto Moses, when He had made an end of communing with him upon Mount Sinai two tables of testimony, tables of stone, written with the finger of God”. So, according to scripture, these “two tables of testimony” are indeed the tables of stone containing the Ten Commandments.

Now, just to recap, we have a law written with “the finger of God” (Exodus 31:18) and a law written by “the hand of Moses” (2 Chronicles 33:8). The law written by God was written on “tables of stone” (Exodus 31:18); the law written by Moses was written in a “book” (Deuteronomy 31:24). The law written by God was placed “INTO the ark” (Exodus 25:16), and the law written by Moses was placed “in the side of the ark” (Deuteronomy 31:26).

Now listen closely; it is recorded that the law written by Moses was placed in the side of the ark “that it may be there for a witness against thee”. This law that placed in the side of the ark was against them as a “witness” because that law contained the judgments and curses against any that transgressed the law of God which was in the ark. For it is written “all Israel have transgressed thy law, even by departing, that they might not obey thy voice; therefore the curse is poured upon us, and the oath that is written in the law of Moses the servant of God, because we have sinned against him” (Daniel 9:11). And that is why Paul said in Colossians 2:14 that “the handwriting of ordinances was against us” because these “ordinances by the hand of Moses” were placed “in the side of the ark of the covenant of the Lord your God, that it may be there for a witness against thee”.

Therefore, this “handwriting of ordinances” which was against us, which scripture declares to be the written “ordinances by the hand of Moses” was what was nailed to the cross, according to Colossians 2:14, not the Ten Commandments which were the writing of God. These ordinances which Moses wrote which were “against us and contrary to us” for transgressing God’s law was nailed to the cross of Christ, because Christ paid the penalty for us, so the penalty won’t have to be against us. Therefore, by Christ suffering the penalty that was against us, FOR US, he “took it out of the way nailing it to his cross”. Therefore, Paul says in verse 16-17 “Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ”. God’s Ten Commandments did not have anything in them pertaining to “meat or drink”. Therefore, that is one clue that this law is not the one being referred to in Colossians 2:14-17. Also, the “Sabbath days” being referred to here is not the Seventh day Sabbath That God wrote with his own finger in his ten commandment law, but, these sabbaths are referring to the Sabbaths that were written in the law of Moses, recorded in (Leviticus 23:24,27, and 32). Therefore, because the Law of Moses was abolished, which is the hand writing of ordinances, those Sabbath days contained in Moses’ law were abolished along with it (Ephesians 2:15). Also, all of those meat and drink festivals contained in that law were also abolished with that law. Because that law passed away, everything that was contained in that law came to an end.
It should also be pointed out that the law of God was never against us, for scripture declares “the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good” (Romans 7:12). Notice how the Law of God still “IS”. For Paul says the law IS holy, IS just, IS good. While the Law of Moses is past tense and referred to as “WAS”. For God’s law is the eternal law; for it is, and always will be the standard of righteousness and the measure of our love. “For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments” (1 John 5:3). Yea, “Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city” (Revelation 22:14).

Jason - Tue, 03/06/2012 - 00:05

Hey Elaine, it Jason again:)

In reply to your comment regarding the Old and New Covenant, it must be understood what the Old Covenant was, AND WAS NOT.

THE OLD COVENANT:
For it is written "Deuteronomy 9:9 “When I (Moses) was gone up into the mount to receive the tables of stone, even the tables of the covenant which the LORD made with you…” According to this verse, “the tables of stone” which contained the Ten Commandments were called “the tables of the covenant”. How do we know that these “tables of stone” contained the Ten Commandments? It is written “And he (God) declared unto you his covenant, which he commanded you to perform, even Ten Commandments; and he wrote them upon two tables of stone” (Deuteronomy 4:13). Those “two tables of stone” containing the Ten Commandments were not the covenant itself, but what the covenant was based upon. A covenant is only an agreement between two parties based on mutual promises, but, the agreement has to be based upon something; and in this case the agreement was based upon obedience to God’s Ten Commandments. God gave Ten Commandments, and the Israelites agreed to obey those commandments. Therefore, the Ten Commandments which were written on the tables of stone were called “the tables of the covenant” because it was the basis of the covenant.

Exodus 24:3 says “And Moses came and told the people all the words of the LORD, and all the judgments: and all the people answered with one voice, and said, All the words which the LORD hath said will we do”. So, it is written that after “Moses came and told the people all the words of the LORD”, all the people agreed to those words that were spoken by the LORD and “answered with one voice, and said, All the words which the LORD hath said will we do”. Thus, through their agreement to obey God’s words, the covenant was made. God laid down the basis of the covenant which was “All the words which the LORD hath said”, the people agreed to that, and the covenant was then established with blood. For it is written “And Moses took half of the blood, and put it in basons; and half of the blood he sprinkled on the altar. And he took the book of the covenant, and read in the audience of the people: and they said, all that the LORD hath said will we do, and be obedient. And Moses took the blood, and sprinkled it on the people, and said, Behold the blood of the covenant, which the LORD hath made with you concerning all these words” (Exodus 24:6-8). Notice that Moses said “behold the blood of the covenant, which the LORD hath made with you concerning all these words”. Here, we also read that the covenant was not the Ten Commandment law itself, but, the covenant was made “concerning all these words”. Therefore, Exodus 34:28 calls the Ten Commandments “the words of the covenant”, not the covenant itself, but “the words” on which the covenant was based.

So, now that we know the Ten Commandments were NOT the Old Covenant, but were only the basis of that Old Covenant, then it is clear that the Ten Commandments law itself was NOT the Old Covenant which passed away. Remember, the covenant was only an agreement; therefore, what passed away was only the agreement of the covenant between God and the nation of Israel as a whole. Why did this agreement pass away? Well, we just read that the covenant was based on “All the words which the LORD hath said”, which were Ten Commandments, written on two tables of stone. And the people agreed to those words by saying “All that the LORD hath said will we do, and be obedient” (Exodus 24:7). It is written that the people agreed to be “obedient” to what the Lord has said, and thus, the covenant was made.

However, it is written that “the LORD said unto Moses, Behold, thou shalt sleep with thy fathers; and this people will rise up, and go a whoring after the gods of the strangers of the land, whither they go to be among them, and will forsake me, and break my covenant which I have made with them” (Deuteronomy 31:16). God informed Moses that his covenant would be broken by the people which promised to be obedient to his law. Therefore, because God’s law was transgressed by those whom agreed to be obedient, God sought a New Covenant with a people that would be obedient to his law. For it is written “Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD: But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people” (Jeremiah 31:31-35).

THE NEW COVENANT:
God gave the reason for a New Covenant by saying “my covenant they brake”. Remember, the covenant was concerning “All the words which the LORD hath said”, Therefore, breaking the covenant meant refusing to obey his law. For it is written “They kept not the covenant of God, and refused to walk in his law” (Psalm 78:10). The fault was squarely on the human side which refused to walk in his law. Therefore, Hebrews 8:8-9 says; “For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.” What was the fault again? Well, according to God “they continued not in my covenant” saith the Lord, therefore he said “I regarded them not”. Thus, a second covenant was necessary, “For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second” (Hebrews 8:7). So, because God’s first covenant was broken through disobedience, finding fault with them, God sought after a second.

So, if the first covenant was based upon obedience, but was broken through disobedience, then what do we think God was looking to establish with the second? Well, according to God in Jeremiah 31:31-35, He wanted to establish a covenant with a people that would allow Him to write his laws in their heart so that they could obey it. As It is written “But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people”. The first covenant was broken through disobedient because they trusted in their own power to obey. For they said “All the words which the LORD hath said WE WILL DO”. They trusted that they could obey simply because they promised to obey. The obedience was based upon human effort. And that is why it is written that the second covenant is a “better covenant” because it was “established upon better promises” (Hebrews 8:6). What were these better promises? These better promises were the promises of GOD, and not of man. The promise that God will give us the power to overcome by writing his law within our heart. By allowing God to write his laws in our hearts and inward parts, He now gives us the power, and delight to do his will. For, it is written “I delight to do thy will, O my God: yea, thy law is within my heart." (Psalms 40:8). Thus, obedience is made possible by the writing of God's law on the heart. Through spiritual regeneration the mind and heart are transformed. Christ enters into the life of the believer and imparts His own strength for obedience. For It is written "For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." (Romans 8:3-4). Paul said that the law was weak through the flesh; meaning that the law had no power within itself to make a sinner obedient. However, because of Jesus' sinless, obedient life in the flesh, he can now give us this power so that “the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit."

It is very important to understand that the New Covenant law written on the heart is exactly the same law that was graven on the stones; for God only has one law. The principles of that law reflect the very character of God, and form the basis for His government. The difference is not in the law but in the ministration of the law. Written only upon the tables of stone, they can only condemn and minister death, "because the carnal mind ... is not subject to the law of God" (Romans 8:7). But written within the heart, our carnal mind is transformed so that “the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." God writes his law in our heart that we sin not against him. For it is written “Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee” (Psalm 119:11). Scripture confirms that it must be written in our heart that we sin not. So, the conclusion of the matter is, if God is writing his law in our heart under the New Covenant then his law still exists today.

Please avoid article-length comments. They inhibit the flow of conversation and don't get read as much as people are likely to not want to wade through all the words. - website editor

Charles R - Tue, 03/06/2012 - 00:49

I've been mostly living in Germany for the past eight years. Initiatives such as these are driven by social forces. As many nationalities do, German's deeply value their cultural traditions. These include all those church holidays and free Sundays. To them, it doesn't matter that the churches are empty on Sunday, but culturally this is how a German should live. Entering into the EU, they naturally wish to impose as much German culture as they can get away with.

There is a severe backlash to the rapid influx of a Turkish population. Germans also look across the pond at America and think we are somehow insane with our incessant drive to work so hard and accumulate stuff. They don't want their society to become Turkish, and in this global economy, they also don't want it to become the capitalistic monstrosity that is "America". They see it as a threat that will subtly take them over...perhaps for good reason.

I moved there in 2004. The vast majority of restaurants would close between 2p.m. and 6:30p.m. Many other stores would simply close for lunch. By 6p.m., all normal stores were locked up tight. On Sunday, if you wanted to buy something, you had to go to the gas station or the train station, everything else was closed.

This has been changing steadily. Now, many restaurants remain open during the day. In a 'traditional' town, most stores are open until 8p.m. In a city, there will be several grocery stores that stay open until midnight. Train stations have been built up into mini-malls to get around the exception of Sunday laws. The society is swiftly starting to look more and more like a capitalistic, consumeristic one.

Younger Germans see this as progress, but the older ones view it as an attack on their cultural way. They want businesses to do business in the German way...or don't come there. They want foreigners to adopt German cultural ways, or go away.

As for religion...the day is built on a religious tradition. But the people only pay lip service to the religion. December 24th is the best attended church service...beyond that...not much. In this area, SDAs look fantastic in Germany...we actually go to church on purpose! To indoctrinate their children, religious education is carried out in the schools. 1st grade is universal Christianity. 2nd grade divides up into Catholicism and Evangelische (Lutheran). Once the children have finished their religious education, the school even goes to the churches for their special services of becoming a member. In the theater, Sunday matinees are not uncommon. A matinee begins at 11:00 a.m. The society values its free time, but has replaced it with all sorts of events beyond 'church'. As for the church holidays...to a German, those have essentially become an accepted day for drunken partying.

Ryan Seaton - Wed, 03/07/2012 - 08:36

Dude! Tell me you didn't sit down and type out all those years. Kewl. They're still on the case http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/italy-labour-union.fjo

David Robbins - Thu, 04/26/2012 - 19:00

If such a law was passed and I refused to obey what would be the penalty?

Jason - Sun, 05/06/2012 - 11:51

It may be better to get a full understanding of this sunday law and who is the true power behind it.

http://www.babylonmysteryreligion.com/The%20Mark.htm

Any further questions,feel free to ask.

User login

Newsletter

Organizations

Fri, 08/31/2012 - Sun, 09/02/2012
Job Dybdahl, Sigve Tonstad, Harri Kuhalampi
Sat, 09/08/2012 | San Diego Adventist Forum
Sigve Tonstad, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Religion, Loma Linda University

Current Issue

Not yet a subscriber? Subscribe today!

Ads

Support Spectrum

Connect with Spectrum